Continental Features/Continental News Service
"The newspaper-feature super-channel"
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Over the years, Continental Features/Continental News Service (and its original parent company Inkslinger's Review) never published a mission statement. We simply honored commitments readers noticed we valued in the pages of Continental Newstime magazine and other publications of CF/CNS. Whether news is breaking in the national (U.S.) or world arena, regardless of the subject matter--defense, business and trade, national security, international relations, public finance, environmental policy, Constitutional liberty, traditional civil rights, social-welfare programs, labor-management disputes, the progression of U.S. Supreme Court decisions--the Continental News Service specializes in covering the unreported and under-reported U.S. and world news. In fact, one observer wrote that we report "both national and international issues which newspapers and magazines usually treat too generally or, despite their importance, not at all..."
Dear reader, you yourself might wonder why CF/CNS does not jump on the bandwagon of any politician in the U.S. Our editorials and commentary discuss both public policies which have merit and those of which we disapprove, while not endorsing the candidacy of any politician. (But that does not mean that CF/CNS does not point out when leaders have been misrepresented or denied a fair hearing.) Actually, there are at least 3 reasons for this position. One, the Continental News Service and Continental Newstime magazine thereby maintain our journalistic objectivity. Two, we easily recall the sense of betrayal we and other Americans experienced after placing the public's trust in various Administrations, only to be rewarded with revelations of political scandal OR violation of public law. Three, we dedicate ourselves seriously, anyway, to the principle of constitutionalism, a government based on written, rights-based, non-discriminatory objective laws, not government based on the self-interested, momentary and arbitrary will of any man or group. Yes, our position squares with that of Washington, Franklin, Adams, Jefferson, Madison and America's other Founding Fathers--and, indeed, with that of America's forefathers generally. As a result, the outcome of our efforts, here at CF/CNS, is a newsmagazine that satisfies a wide variety of reader interests.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Continental News Service division of CF/CNS, during its 36 years of operation, has conducted investigative reports into the funeral-home industry; the market-research industry; the adequacy of Congressionally-authorized food-stamp allotments (periodically); gas-pump price gouging and fuel smuggling; service deficiencies in Employment Department programs; non-Bible-based churches' insistence on tithing despite their ineligibility for tithing; school-tutoring programs; the CIA's MKULTRA "program"; the consumer abuses perpetrated by non-profit organizations which operate contests/games/sweepstakes; DUI classroom instruction that notoriously fails to rehabilitate drinking drivers; the unanticipated consequences of various media organizations' abandonment of toll-free telephone numbers; evidence that the overseas-based Association of Christian Journalists has been infiltrated by the Putin regime in Russia; and the cancer-research activities of Fort Detrick, Maryland...Yes, Continental News follows, and inspects, news developments and events near and far in defense of the public interest.
Our Editorial Position on the Mueller probe
What would America's Founding Fathers say?
It is the editorial position of the Continental News Service that the Framers of the Constitution, in particular, would say, reading Order Number 3915-2017 signed by Acting Attorney-General Rod J. Rosenstein, that Robert S. Mueller III is not fulfilling his entire responsibility to "ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election" and that he is obligated to repair this breach in the performance of his mandate immediately and that if he does not, the President should replace him in that investigation and assign additional attorneys of his choice to help fulfill the entire bipartisan mandate contained in the Deputy Attorney-General's Order. It is certain that the Framers would also call attention to the power of Congress to de-fund the current Special Counsel Office since it has not demonstrated in any way that it is interested in obtaining “a full and thorough investigation of [all] the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election.” Some Framers of the Constitution might have favored appointment of a blue-ribbon, fact-finding commission first.
In any case, it is duly noted that Order Number 3915-2017 indicates that investigating "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump" is only one part of the Special Counsel's duty included under that Order. Since the present Special Counsel has confined his energy and activity to this one aspect of his responsibility, it is apparent that he is overwhelmed by the true magnitude of the assignment given him and is incapable of fulfilling that responsibility for one reason or another. It is further the belief of the Continental News Service that the Framers of the Constitution would (1) say that the Order as drafted reflects political bias and should be amended, and (2) suggest that, since the present Special Counsel is inclined to imagine a fishing expedition with regard to the campaign of Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump, he should be required, as well, in the interest of equity and balance, to embark upon a corresponding investigation with regard to the campaign of Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and with regard to officials of the then-sitting Administration of President Barack Obama, in order to retain his mandate to investigate at all.
Gary P. Salamone/Editor-in-Chief
Continental News Service
View from a "Citizen on the Street"
One of our patrons suggested that Continental Features/Continental News Service offer a variation of the "Letter to the Editor" opportunity for reader input, and we were immediately on the same wavelength because we believe that many an individual adult, because of his or her unique vantage point in society or government, has some best contribution he or she can make to public-policy making. It does not matter whether you are contacting us from Taiwan, China, the Ukraine, Rwanda, Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Argentina, or anywhere else on the planet. We are interested in your striking a statesman-like posture, so to speak. Simply fill out the Webform under the Contact tab above. That way patrons need not worry about drafting a well-crafted "Letter to the Editor." Just a simple, well-thought-out idea for improving a government policy or program anywhere on Earth will do. If you are ordering, or already have placed an order in, Continental Newstime general-interest newsmagazine or the Country Neighbor Edition and if we think your idea meets the above-mentioned requirement, stimulating thoughtful dialogue and best practices around the world, CF/CNS will print your "Citizen on the Street" viewpoint in whichever edition you have ordered.
One reader favors withdrawing all U.S. troops from Afghanistan, even the military advisors still trying to whip national forces into shape after almost two decades of effort, and placing those American soldiers withdrawn, estimated to number at least 14,000, on the U.S.-Mexican frontier to establish border security.
The national debate orchestrated on not a few issues distorts the facts. The issue is not whether the U.S. proceeds to "begin constructing a wall on the U.S.-Mexican border." After all, Americans, at a minimum, can access Internet photos of the wall that currently exists on some portions of that border. Official government reports measure in excess of 650 miles of barriers of one kind or another on the U.S.-Mexican border. While some portions of the "fenced border" are inadequate for preventing all forms of illegal entry into the U.S., there are 352.8 miles of pedestrian or primary fencing, 36 miles of secondary fencing behind pedestrian or primary fencing, and 299.8 miles of vehicle-barrier fencing. As a result, the actual issue, instead, is whether the U.S. moves to "continue, or extend, and strengthen the existing wall the full length of the 1,900-mile-plus U.S.-Mexican border."
Copyright @ Continental News Service. All rights reserved.
By David Anthony and Dan Alan
One unsound public policy often compensates for another ill-advised public policy, and, so the Obama Administration, for one, compensated for the social engineering of abortion that has destroyed the worker-to-retiree ratio in our Social Security program, through an attempt to throw open the country's borders to illegal immigration, not only to camouflage that policy failure, but to increase the ratio of workers to retirees and pad the vote totals of Mr. Obama's political party.
Editor's Note: There is more sense in designating Democrat-dominated states as red states and Republican-dominated states as blue states. Can the reader who likes to use labels understand why?